Legal Opinion

Prout v. Prout

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1946No. Civ. 3504PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of divorce. Each of the parties had been previously married and each had some separate property. All of this property had been placed in joint tenancy, and some two years before this action was started it was divided by agreement, the defendant receiving some property which had been the separate property of the plaintiff. At least some of the property she received was rental property.

The parties also had a residence which was community property. The court entered an interlocutory decree in favor of the defendant on her cross-complaint, gave her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Jones v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Waters v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Jenkins v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Gaston v. Cooperative Farm Chemicals Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API