Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Peckinpaugh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1912No. 21,748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Delaware Circuit Court, James S. Engle, Special Judge: Drainage proceeding by William Peckinpaugh and others against which George E. Wiley and others remonstrated. From a judgment establishing the drain, the remonstrants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Appellees filed their petition in the Delaware Circuit Court, to establish a drain affecting lands and public highways in Delaware and Henry counties, Indiana, under §6141 Burns 1908, Acts 1907 p. 508, §2. On the filing of a second or new report by the drainage commissioners, in compliance with an order of court, and striking out a remonstrance thereto by appellants Ocker, Painters, and others, and sustaining the remonstrance of appellant George E. Wiley, the court ordered said drain established, and approved the drainage commissioners’ report of assessments and damages, from which judgments…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wolcott v. HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Papenbrook v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Click v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Northern Indiana Land Co. v. CarlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API