Legal Opinion
Van Russell v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 13, 1995No. Nos. 95 C 1508, 95 C 2102PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
Van Russell and Evans ask for a writ of habeas corpus. Both were sentenced to prison and to special parole terms; Van Russell for heroin related offenses in Illinois and Kent for marijuana offenses in Georgia.
Both men served their time in prison and were released on special parole and both ran afoul of the terms of release, and the Parole Commission revoked their paroles. All credit for time spent outside prison while on parole was forfeited and the Commission imposed periods of incarceration followed by an additional term of special parole.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ruben Ramirez Sanchez v. H.G. Miller, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Marion, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Behrooz K. BehnezhadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Timothy Tyrone RockwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kent Evans v. United States Parole Commission, Jay Van Russell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996