Legal Opinion

Fort Dodd Partnership v. Trooien

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1986No. C2-86-479PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Fort Dodd Partnership appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of respondent Gerald L. Trooien. The trial court determined that Fort Dodd could neither maintain an action for the recovery of its contract payments under a contract for deed held with respondent Trooien nor could it maintain an action for unjust enrichment based on the increased market value of the property following statutory cancellation. We affirm.

FACTS

On July 10, 1979 Fort Dodd, a limited partnership consisting of two general partners and 15 limited partners, and Trooien entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cady v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Anderson v. DeLisleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Hommerding v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. DygertDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
  2. Kosbau v. DressCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Miller v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API