Mahood v. Omaha Property & Casualty
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHAPIRO, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Dr. William H. Mahood (“Ma-hood”), filing a complaint against Omaha Property and Casualty (“Omaha”), initially alleged breach of contract and bad faith in connection with a flood insurance claim. Because the flood insurance policy in dispute is a Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”), issued under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 4001 et seq., federal law governs this dispute 1 and state claims are preempted; plaintiff voluntarily withdrew his state law-based claims and is proceeding on a claim under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Re Van Holt, Jo Van Holt v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Linder and Associates, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Neill v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Kennedy v. CNA InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Burns v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sun Ray Village Owners Ass'n v. Old Dominion InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2008
- Harding v. CIANBRO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Bruinsma v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006
- Allen v. Wright National Flood Insurance Services, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Covington Lodging, Inc. v. Western World Insurance Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021