Legal Opinion

Easy v. State of Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1988No. 87-297PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

This case arose in the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, Montana. Fred Easy, hereafter the plaintiff, appeals from the District Court’s instruction to the jury that a laid-off state employee is entitled to a “tie-breaker” preference in rehiring by state agencies. The plaintiff argues that the state employment policy affords him an absolute preference in rehiring by the State. The State contends that the intent, interpretation, and constant application of the policy has been as a tie-breaker preference, i.e. giving laid-off state workers a preference if they are as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Montana Power Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Crabtree v. Montana State LibraryMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Borkowski v. SnowdenAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Des Moines Independent Community School District v. Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark Fork Coalition v. Montana Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. BNSF Railway Co. v. FeitMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Personnel Division v. Child Support InvestigatorsMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kirchner v. State, Department of Public Health & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Grievance of Brady v. Montana Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API