Legal Opinion · Dissent

Saslow v. Andrew (In re Loretto Winery Ltd.)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1990No. Nos. 87-2928, 88-1767Published

1DissentBeezer, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm and hold that the Producers’ lien is not enforceable against a bona fide purchaser.

Section 545(2) of the Bankruptcy Code allows a trustee to avoid a lien that

is not perfected or enforceable on the date of the filing of the petition [for bankruptcy] against a bona fide purchaser that purchases such property on the date of the filing of the petition, whether or not such a purchaser exists.

11 U.S.C. § 545(2). Federal preemption makes this law superior to any state scheme of creditor priorities. International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, 278 U.S. 261, 265, 49 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Finnell v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In the Matter of Caldwell Joseph Trahan. Rodney Bernard, Jr., Trustee v. Beneficial Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. In the Matter of Tape City, U.S.A., Inc., Debtor. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Tape City, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. In The Matter Of Martin Exploration CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API