State v. Hetzel
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSabers, Justice
[¶ 14.] 1. HETZEL’S TRIAL WAS NOT SCHEDULED WITHIN 180 DAYS AFTER HIS FIRST APPEARANCE AS REQUIRED BY SDCL 23A-44-5.1.
[¶ 15.] The majority opinion claims that the 180-day period began on November 18, 1997, when Hetzel appeared for arraignment on the indictment. However, the trial court found that the 180-day period commenced on September 28, 1997, when he “appeared” before the county clerk of courts and was released on bond. I agree with the trial court. Therefore, I dissent.
[¶ 16.] On September 28, 1997, Hetzel was released from custody on bond and required to execute a waiver of his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. TiedemanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. KordonowySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994