Legal Opinion

State v. Tiedeman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1988No. 16079PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACTION

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Walter Tiedeman (Tiedeman) appeals his conviction for grand theft. We affirm.

FACTS

Tiedeman was charged by complaint with third degree burglary and grand theft. Tiedeman made his first appearance on these charges on May 6, 1987, and his preliminary hearing was set for June 3, 1987. Tiedeman appeared on June 3, however, state’s witnesses did not appear and state could not proceed. State moved for a continuance which was denied. Thereupon, Tiedeman moved for a dismissal of the charges which was granted without prejudice.

Tiedeman was subsequently recharged in a second…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. People v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. State v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. DaviesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. BroughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. Shilvock-HavirdSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. KarlenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. LowtherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. BeynonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API