Legal Opinion

Haberl v. Rose

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1997No. Docket 177337, 178284PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeff, P.J.

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s judgment of no cause of action following a jury trial on plaintiffs’ automobile negligence claim (Docket No. 177337) and defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for sanctions (Docket No. 178284). We vacate the trial court’s order, which found defendant entitled to governmental immunity and remand for entiy of a judgment on the jury’s verdict of $260,000 in favor of plaintiffs.

I

On July 5, 1991, defendant, while acting within the scope of her employment with a governmental employer and driving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Stapleton v. Independent Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Frazier v. RumisekMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bauer v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. U-Haul of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Alex v. WildfongMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. NATIONSBANC MORTGAGE CORP. v. LuptakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Stanton v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Backus v. KauffmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API