Legal Opinion

Britt v. Cusick

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 2014No. COA13-387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendants Kathleen Cusick, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, doing business as Carolinas Healthcare System and doing business as Carolinas Medical Center, and Carolinas Physician Network, Inc., doing business as Charlotte Obstetrics and Gynecologic Associates, appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motion of plaintiff Marshall Kelly Britt, Jr., as administrator of the Estate of Dana Robinson Britt, to quash defendants’ notice of deposition and his motion for a protective order. Defendants’ interlocutory appeal is from a discovery order that barred defendants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Turner v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chastain v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Murray v. Univ. of N.C. at Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Stokes v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Stokes v. CrumptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API