Legal Opinion
In Re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATION
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 1, 2013No. Misc. No. 2007-0493Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONIN-FRINGEMENT REGARDING DEVICES IDENTIFIED IN TABLE 15
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, sues multiple manufacturers of digital cameras for alleged infringement of two patents owned by Papst: U.S. Patent Number 6,470,399 (399 Patent) and U.S. Patent Number 6,895,449 (449 Patent). The Camera Manufacturers 1 have moved for summary judgment of non-infringement with respect to the devices listed in Table 15 of Papst Final Infringement Contentions. Because Papst has not alleged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Desper Products, Inc. And Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. v. Qsound Labs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Welker Bearing Co. v. PhD, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.