Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Peterson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14717PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Appeal by administrator with the will annexed from decree of partial distribution.

Mary Johnson died testate March 12, 1922. Probate proceedings were held in abeyance for some ten years awaiting the termination of litigation growing out of the probate of the estate of her deceased husband. The last will and testament of said Mary Johnson bequeathed to petitioners and respondents here, in respective proportions, the sum of $6,000. On December 12, 1931, an inventory and appraisement was made showing that the entire property of the estate consisted of $1319.23 in money, household furniture valued…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. In Re Estate of HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Estate of FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Cohn v. Anglo-California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Babcock v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Parr v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API