Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Commission on Human Rght., No. Cv 99 0496223 (Oct. 23, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 23, 2000No. CV 99 0496223Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

This is an administrative appeal by the plaintiffs, Ricky and Regina Cooper, from a final decision of a hearing officer of the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities ("CHRO"), dismissing the plaintiffs' affidavit of illegal discrimination ("complaint") against Andrew and Hanna Gorski, alleging housing discrimination because of the plaintiffs' race (black).1 The plaintiffs' appeal is authorized by General Statutes §§ 46a-94a and 4-183 of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act ("UAPA"). For…

2Cases cited9 opinions

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
Pinchback v. Armistead Homes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
Connecticut Humane Society v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
New England Cable Television Ass'n v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.