Legal Opinion

Hammons v. O'Brien

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1927No. Civil No. 2551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This suit was brought by the superintendent of banks, as receiver of the Mayer State Bank, to collect from J. E. O’Brien five promissory notes, taken over by the superintendent as part of the assets of such bank. The notes were in regular form, signed by O’Brien, and payable to the Mayer State Bank. The defense, as set out in the answer to the complaint, was:

“That defendant did not, for himself or for his own use or benefit, receive any consideration whatsoever for the said promissory notes or any of them; that all of the moneys represented by said promissory notes were moneys advanced for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Doxy v. Exchange Bank of PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hooper v. LevinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  2. Bank of Douglas v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Sepo v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Neil v. TuleyArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Wright v. KrouskopWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API