Legal Opinion

Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. Dba Southwest Tank Liners, Inc. v. Joor Manufacturing, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-6208, 86-6470PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

Joor Manufacturing (Joor) successfully sought to have the Western Fire Chiefs Association (WFCA) amend its influential model fire code in a manner disadvantageous to Sessions Tank Liners, Inc. (Sessions), a competitor. Sessions sued Joor for violating the Sherman Act. The district court granted the defendant summary judgment, ruling that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine exempted Joor’s conduct from antitrust liability. Sessions appeals.

We conclude that legitimate efforts to influence or lobby private, model code associations are protected by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. RRR Farms, Ltd. v. American Horse Protection Ass'n, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  4. Robbins v. BlecherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Ex Parte SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API