Legal Opinion

Beard v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 5, 1828PublishedCited by 7 opinions

chancerit. Error to the Lincoln Circuit; John L. Bridges, Judge. Entries. Mistakes. Evidence. Surveys. Compact with Virginia. Statutes. Forfeiture of Entries. Constitutional law. Construction. Limitations. Prescription. Natural and public law. Legislative powers. Jlncient domain. Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

*430Opinion of

Chief Justice Bren.

This case involves, 1st, the merit and demerits of conflicting adversary claims derived from tile State of Virginia, depending upon ru]es for determining the precision and specialty of entries: 2dly, The construction of the compact between the State of Virginia, and the State of Kentucky.

By bill exhibited in March, 1821, the complainant, Beard and wife, ask relief against a judgment in ejectment obtained by Smith, J

The complainants rely upon this entry:

“June 2d, 1180.”
“Arthur Campbell enters 600 acres upon Ty. Wf. on Elat creek, about two miles northwest, of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  3. Prevost v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Shipp v. Miller's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  5. Whitaker v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. City of Louisville v. GermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. ByrdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. State v. McKnight.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API