Legal Opinion
Green v. West, County Treasurer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 8, 1931No. 13141PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
June 8, 1931. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The petitioner procured to be issued by this Court a rule which required the respondents to show cause before it why they, who are the treasurer, the auditor, and the supervisor of Oconee County, should not be compelled by a writ of mandamus to levy a tay upon the taxable property of the county sufficient to pay the amount of a judgment, viz.: $2,000.00, with interest and costs, which had been recovered by the petitioner against the county.
The judgment was obtained in an action brought by petitioner as administratrix of Allen Green, who…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Commissioners of Taxing Dist. of Brownsville v. LoagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Home of the Friendless v. RouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Butz v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foster v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Brown v. Town of PatrickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Clary v. Harvey, County AuditorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Gregory v. RollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956