Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Chesworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Because it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the court to declare a mistrial, petitioner’s retrial on the same criminal charges is prohibited by the double jeopardy provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions. Before declaring a mistrial in a criminal action it is incumbent upon a trial court to explore appropriate alternatives and to abort the trial only as a last resort (see People v Michael, 48 NY2d 1; Matter of Respeto v McNab, 90 AD2d 308; Matter of Girard v Rossi, 40 AD2d 13). Under the circumstances here, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Enright v. SiedleckiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Respeto v. McNabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Girard v. RossiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. LottoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API