Legal Opinion

Enright v. Siedlecki

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1983PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Meyer, J.

Manifest necessity for the declaration of a mistrial in a criminal case exists when after opening statements referring to a confession have been made, the prosecutor discovers a Miranda warnings statement indicating that defendant had requested counsel and the confession is, after a hearing, suppressed. Manifest necessity likewise exists when an essential defense witness becomes unavailable; the Trial Judge is not limited by defendant’s attorney’s request for a continuance rather than a mistrial and in passing upon the continuance request may take into account an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. MATTER OF DAVIS v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Hylton v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Robles v. BambergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API