Enright v. Siedlecki
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
Manifest necessity for the declaration of a mistrial in a criminal case exists when after opening statements referring to a confession have been made, the prosecutor discovers a Miranda warnings statement indicating that defendant had requested counsel and the confession is, after a hearing, suppressed. Manifest necessity likewise exists when an essential defense witness becomes unavailable; the Trial Judge is not limited by defendant’s attorney’s request for a continuance rather than a mistrial and in passing upon the continuance request may take into account an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. FergusonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- MATTER OF DAVIS v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hylton v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Robles v. BambergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.