United States Ex Rel. Fortmueller v. Commissioner of Immigration
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
Both the Labor Department and the court are obligated to carry out the will of Congress as expressed in the immigration laws. It is not within the province of either to exercise its own notion as to the policy or justice of the legislation. So also it is beyond the power of the court to disregard, much less to set aside, findings of fact by the Labor Department if, on examinátion of the record, it ascertain that they rest on substantial evidence. However much in dispute and however open to divergent inferences, if the proof were such that the department could reach the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States Ex Rel. Tisi v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Skeffington v. KatzeffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
- Ungar v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Wolck v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States Ex Rel. Trinler v. CarusiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- United States ex rel. Von Kleczkowski v. WatkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Soewapadji v. WixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.