Legal Opinion

Hertzberg v. Kapo Dyeing & Printing Co.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided January 6, 1941Published

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner was regularly employed by the respondent as production manager of its dyeing and printing plant at Haledon, New Jersey. His weekly wages were fixed at the rate of $75, and his duties, while dealing primarily with production over which he had full and complete charge, required him, among other things, to expedite all special rush orders. It so happened that on the morning of March 9th, 1939, the petitioner was fulfilling a special rush order for one of its important New York customers, Ciro Fabrics, Inc., which order had been promised for ten o’clock delivery by Ciro’s motor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zappala v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Furferi v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Stier v. City of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Voorhees v. Smith Schoonmaker Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Hall v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API