Legal Opinion
Waterman v. Aakre
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 29, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My judgment in this cause is that the petitioner is entitled to a decree, with costs, exonerating it from liability and that there must be a dismissal, with costs, of the libel as against the Aakre, her owner, the Lamport & Holt Line, Ltd., and all the impleaded respondents.
I shall deal hereinafter with the question of costs as between the libelant and the impleaded respondent and as between them inter sese.
I. My subject matter jurisdiction herein is based on the fact that this is 'a cause in admiralty, Title 28 United States Code, Section 41(3), 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(3).
II.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bank Line, Ltd. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waterman v. AakreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Ore S. S. Corp. v. the CypriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Middleton & Co. v. Ocean Dominion S. S. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Lucero v. Northland Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
- Waterman v. AakreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.