Legal Opinion
Rinker v. Local Union No. 24 of Amalgamated Lithographers
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 19, 1963No. 13978PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGELLI, District Judge.
The appeal in this case must be dismissed because the order from which the appeal is taken lacks finality and was not entered in accordance with the provisions of Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The action is one under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 [LMRDA], 29 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq.
The complaint is in two counts. Plaintiff, Floyd Rinker, is a former member of defendant Local Union No. 24 of Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Local 24) and a former employee of defendant William G. Johnston Company, which had a collective…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Etten v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Rinker v. Local Union No. 24 of Amalgamated LithographersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Carey v. DaneckiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- Herman Rekant v. Shochtay-Gasos Union Local 446 of the Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Artis Jackson v. James A. Hart, F.B.I., Gabriel Bergamo, Margaret Link, Dolores Mooney, Robert A. Baine, Harold Lester Howard, and Vincent LoffaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Pegler v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Schnur & Cohan, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Floyd Rinker v. Local Union No. 24 Of Amalgamated Lithographers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.