Legal Opinion

United States v. Arreguin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 7, 2003No. CR S-02-104 LKKPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

Defendants in this federal criminal prosecution move for discovery concerning an affidavit filed in support of a state-authorized wiretap (Orange County wiretap # 02-01) and the investigation reports concerning the subject of that wiretap, Reyna-Madrigal, and the subject of an earlier wiretap, Mora. 1 Because the state wiretap information was used to obtain a further wiretap issued by - this court, defendants seek discovery in order to attack those underlying wiretaps. At issue is whether defendants’ request may be granted in light of the government’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. WestDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. United States v. Mark ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API