Legal Opinion

Mount v. Rockford State Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1925No. 19046. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover the value of a quantity of grain claimed by the plaintiff to have been converted by the defendant. The trial to the court without a jury resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment dismissing the action, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The facts are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows: On November 17, 1919, Roy Greer and wife, being then the owners of a farm in Spokane county, mortgaged the same to the appellant to secure the payment of their promissory notes aggregating the sum of $10,000. The Greers made default in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beall v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hardy v. HerriottWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Knipe v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Debenture Corp. of London v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Manvell v. WeaverWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davin v. DowlingWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Parrish v. Southwest Washington Production Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Pease v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Farmers State Bank v. ChickWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kirby v. First National Bank of PascoWashington Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API