Legal Opinion
Marquardt v. Papenfuse
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 7, 1992No. 1468, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATHELL, Judge.
Chief Judge Wilner, in our recent case of Baker v. State, 89 Md.App. 564, 566-67, 598 A.2d 851 (1991), in describing the complaint forming the substance of that action, stated:
The English language, blending and building upon the vocabulary of its Latin and Germanic roots, is a marvelous and omnificent language, offering a rich variety of words and expressions to describe or explain a single thought. And so, in characterizing the complaint made in this appeal by Mr. David Bruce Baker, we have much to choose from — ludicrous, preposterous, silly, asinine, ridiculous, absurd,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bulluck v. Pelham Wood ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Porter v. SchafferCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Major v. First Virginia Bank-Central MarylandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Anne Arundel County v. City of AnnapolisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Andersons v. Great Bay SolarCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Millar v. BowieCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.