Legal Opinion

Lanham v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1935No. 26,235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTreanor, J.

—This is a criminal action commenced by affdavit, in the name of the State of Indiana against Howard Lanham, Noel Lanham, Ruth Lanham, and Ward Lanham, on a charge that the appellants above named being of full age and being financially able, have neglected, without' reasonable cause, to maintain and support their father, Frederick Lanham, the said Frederick Lanham being sick and not able to work and not having sufficient means or ability to maintain or support himself.

The trial court found Howard Lanham, Noel Lanham, and Ruth Lanham guilty, as charged in the affidavit and pronounced sentence…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caudill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Stone v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hindman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API