Legal Opinion

Hindman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1943No. 27,863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

Appellants were convicted upon a charge of failing to support their mother based upon § 10-1410, Burns’ 1942 Replacement, § 2893, Baldwin’s 1934, which concludes with the sentence:

“The provisions of this act shall not apply to children who have not lived with or who have not been supported by their parents when such children were minors.”

The evidence discloses that neither appellant lived with nor was supported by his parents during the entire period of his minority.

This sentence was construed in Lanham et al. v. The State (1935), 208 Ind. 79, 194 N. E. 625, 195 N. E. 73, at page 82, by Judge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lanham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. County Department of Public Welfare v. Scott's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Topps Manufacturing Co. v. BiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API