Legal Opinion
Vintage Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Hayes
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 18, 2011No. 1070315PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURDOCK, Justice.
Thomas Hayes sued his employer, Vintage Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Vintage”), seeking workers’ compensation benefits after he suffered an injury to his foot. Following a trial at which evidence was presented ore tenus, the court found that Hayes had suffered a nonscheduled injury to the body as a whole and awarded Hayes permanent total-disability benefits for a nonscheduled injury. On appeal, the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment, based on that court’s holding that Hayes’s injury should be compensated under Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-57(a)(3)a., as an injury to a scheduled…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Ex Parte Drummond Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Prof. Bus. Owners Ass'n Wkrs. Comp. FundSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- West Fraser, Inc. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Beck v. BeckCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Hollinghead v. Willstaff, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Montgomery County Department of Human Resources v. N.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.