Legal Opinion

People v. Alengi

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 27, 2006No. 04SC493, 04SC494PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

Introduction

We granted certiorari to resolve a split of authority between two divisions of the court of appeals, which adopted different analyses and reached opposite results in identical appeals. Nancy and Paul Alengi, a married couple, were tried and convicted in a joint trial of the same offenses. Prior to trial, the Alengis’ privately-retained attorneys were allowed to withdraw from representation. Thereafter, the Alengis repeatedly advised the court they were in the process of converting their assets to cash in order to retain replacement counsel. The court gave the couple an Arguello…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. BergerudSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. People v. MunseyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. in Int. of B.HSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  4. Vreeland v. ZupanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. People v. WallinColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API