Legal Opinion

Michael Howard v. Nancy Ditsworth

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 31, 2005No. 04-13189; D.C. Docket 03-00090-CV-OC-10-GRJUnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Howard, a white male represented by counsel, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to his employer, J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (“JCP”) and his supervisor, Nancy Ditsworth (“Ditsworth”), in his retaliation suit alleging, inter alia, violations of the Florida Private Whistle Blower Act (“FWA”), Fla. Stat. Ann. §§ 448.102(1) and (3).

On appeal, the Appellees assert that Howard’s FWA claims are barred by the two-year statute of limitations set forth in § 448.103(l)(a). The Appellees maintain that Howard gave oral notice of his intent to cease his employment with JCP on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parks v. City of Warner Robins, GACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Lund v. CookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. LAWYERS TITLE INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Holley v. Innovative Tech. of Destin, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. Florida Pop, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  2. Jane Doe K.R. v. WHG SU Delegates, LLC, Choice Hotels International, Inc., and Choice Hotels International Services Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API