Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Harris, Upham & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1952No. A-3635PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The parties will be identified as in the trial court.

The price of cotton fell during October of 1946 resulting in a loss in the purchase and resale of 700 bales of “December” cotton. This suit determines whether that loss falls upon the cotton broker or upon his customer.

Defendant, Dr. Jack Kahn of Victoria County, is alleged to have purchased 7 separate contracts of cotton (each 100 bales) on October 15th and 16th of 1946. Two of these contracts were sold by the plaintiff broker on the following day (October 17th), and the other five were sold five days later (October 21st) for a loss of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Englestien v. MintzIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Kahn v. Harris, Upham & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Palmer v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  4. Morgan v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MJR Corp. v. B & B VENDING CO., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. McKenzie v. CarteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. United Broadcasting Company, Inc., U.B.C. Sales, Inc., and Their Officers and Richard Eaton v. Jay J. ArmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Reed v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Keelin v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API