State v. Christon
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFain, J.
Defendants-Appellants Jim Christon and Carl Goraleski, both of whom are attorneys, were found in contempt of court and fined $500 each for refusing to proceed to trial in a case in which they were co-counsel. Christon and Goraleski appeal pro se from the findings of contempt. Because the circumstances applying to both appellants are identical, these appeals have been consolidated. Christon and Goraleski jointly assert three assignments of error, claiming that the findings of contempt were an abuse of discretion, denied their clients due process, and constituted an improper civil contempt. For…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Andrew F. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Contempt of MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Bland v. GravesOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Scarnecchia v. Rebhan, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. SchieweOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. KitchenOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.