Legal Opinion

In re Contested Will of Barbineau

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceedings upon probate of a will.

1Opinion of the Court

Varnum, S.

The trial herein was conducted before Surrogate Arnold, and it has now been stipulated that the case be decided by me without a new hearing. The importance of the issues involved, together with "the great number of conflicting statements scattered through the voluminous testimony that was taken, have caused me to feel keenly the disadvantage of being compelled to weigh evidence without seeing and hearing the witnesses who produce it, and I have, therefore, been at pains to give the minutes and the exhaustive briefs submitted the most careful study before arriving at my decision.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . ParishNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Rollwagen v. . RollwagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Tyler v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Forman v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  5. In re Flansburgh's WillNew York Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Contested Will of DwyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  2. In re the Two Contested Wills of EhminneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of SiglNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API