Legal Opinion
Carter v. Bridenstine
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2017-1752Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) KIM L. CARTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-1752 (ABJ) ) JAMES F. BRIDENSTINE, ) Administrator, ) National Aeronautics ) and Space Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kim L. Carter brought this lawsuit under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
29 U.S.C. § 701
et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”),
29 U.S.C. § 621
et seq.,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.