McLellan v. Hamernick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Chief Justice.
This is an action to foreclose a number of mechanics liens.
To begin with there were other liens involved that have since been settled. Reduced to simple terms, the action as tried revolves around the following facts: Nathan and Beverly Elaine Simon were the owners of a house in St. Paul. On March 31, 1958, they engaged Ray Hamemick to construct an addition to the house for a total cost of $11,471.27. The contract contained the provision: “Job to be paid as work progresses and balance upon completion.” Hamemick sublet the plumbing work to Donald E. Becker, who was to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lundstrom Construction Co. v. DygertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Abbott v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Home Supply Co. Inc. v. OstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Crane Co. v. Advance Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Minneapolis Builders Supply Co. v. Calhoun Beach Club Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pierson v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Gadtke v. Bren (In Re Bren)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- First Union National Bank v. RPB 2, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- County of Ramsey v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Mountain Stone Co. v. HW Hammond Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.