Legal Opinion

Church v. Rouillard

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 6, 2019No. 2:15-cv-02165-KJM-EFBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimberly J. Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This action arises from letters the California Department of Managed Health Care ("DMHC") issued to seven private health insurers, which required them to remove any limitations on or exclusions of abortion services from the health care coverage they offer. Second Am. Compl. ("SAC"), Ex. 1, ECF No. 72-1. Plaintiffs Foothill Church, Calvary Chapel Chino *747Hills and Shepherd of the Hills Church ("plaintiffs"), three churches who offer their employees DMHC-regulated health coverage through these insurers, filed this action against defendant Michelle…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foothill Church v. WatanabeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. Foothill Church v. WatanabeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API