Legal Opinion

Ledwith v. Ignatius

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

This is a motion by the defendants directed against the third cause of action set forth in the amended complaint herein. The relief sought is: (1) That plaintiff be directed to serve a further amended complaint making it more definite and certain as to this third cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 102); (2) striking therefrom matter asserted to be unnecessary and impertinent, redundant, sham, frivolous, repetitious and which may tend to prejudice, embarrass and delay the fair trial of the action (rule 103); (3) to separately state and number each separate cause of action alleged or…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. MaassNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Meinhardt v. BrittingNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Shurgour & Bacon Const. Co. v. Empire Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Shtafman v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Wolfson v. MandellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API