Legal Opinion
City of Dayton v. Zoller
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1954No. 2279PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWiseman, P. J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of conviction by the Municipal Court of Dayton for a violation of the noise ordinance of the city of Dayton, Ohio.
The charge made was that the defendant, James E. Zoller, did, on the second day of October 1953, * ‘ while operating a motor vehicle on the streets of the city of Dayton, discharge into the open air the exhaust of said motor vehicle through a muffler which did not effectively prevent loud or explosive noises therefrom,” contrary to Ordinance Section 420-2 (7) of the city of Dayton, Ohio.
The evidence shows that on said date the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Schuster's Express, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1970
- State v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1963