Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1963No. 611PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.

Defendant, appellant herein, was found guilty and fined $25 and costs in the Municipal Court of Piqua for violation of Section 4513.22, Revised Code. He was charged with “operating” a 1955 Ford automobile “when it was not equipped with a muffler that was in good working con-condition.” The judgment was affirmed on appeal by the Court of Common Pleas and is now before us.

It is contended that the decision finding defendant guilty is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law.

The narrative bill of exceptions recites that on January 14, 1961, Ralph Byers, a member of the Ohio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. State v. TitakOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. State v. CoterelOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. City of Dayton v. ZollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Williams, 21723 (9-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API