Legal Opinion
United Technologies Corp. v. Marshall
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 8, 1979No. Civ. H-78-555PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CLARIE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff has moved for a preliminary injunction to restrain the defendants from disclosing certain agency records to a third party, who has requested the records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”). The defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment. The Court finds that the plaintiff has failed to establish either a likelihood of success on the merits or a possibility of irreparable injury, and it therefore denies the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Parks and Conservation Association v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary, Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Vaughn v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Anderson v. Department Of Health And Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Acumenics Research & Technology v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Anderson v. Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- General Chemical Corp. v. Department of Environmental Quality EngineeringMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.