Legal Opinion
Albert's Organics, Inc. v. Holzman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 10, 2020No. 4:19-cv-07477Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALBERT’S ORGANICS, INC., Case No. 19-cv-07477-PJH 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 10 GREG HOLZMAN, et al., STRIKE 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 41 12 13 14 Before the court is plaintiff Albert’s Organics, Inc.’s (“plaintiff”) motion to strike. 15 The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Having read 16 the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal 17 authority, and good cause appearing, the court GRANTS IN PART…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Rawson Food Service, Inc., Debtor. Flav-O-Rich, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Rawson Food Service, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Barnes v. AT & T Pension Benefit Plannonbargained ProgramDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.