Legal Opinion
Erdahl v. Groff
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] This discretionary appeal is from an order issued by the circuit court reversing a decision of the South Dakota Department of Commerce, Division of Human Rights, and remanding the case to the Division for further proceedings. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] Kristine Erdahl (Erdahl) alleges sexual harassment by Dennis Groff (Groff) when she worked as an intern and paralegal in the Pennington County State’s Attorney’s office from October 1993 to May 20, 1994. During most of this period, she worked primarily with Groff, who was the Pennington County…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Darla G. Hall, Patty J. Baxter and Jeannette Ticknor v. Gus Construction Co., Inc. And John MundorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gardner v. Tripp County, SDDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1998
- In Re Estate of JetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Beals v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Interest of D.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Wiest v. MontanaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.