Legal Opinion

Urquhart Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1968No. Appeal, 269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

On November 15, 1964, R. M. Urquhart was, on petition of his nephew G. Gordon Urquhart, II, adjudged incompetent, and the Provident Tradesmens Bank and Trust Company (now Provident National Bank) was appointed guardian of that part of his estate located in Pennsylvania. The petition was joined in by Mr. Urquhart’s two brothers, one of whom, W. K. B. Urquhart, is now deceased.

Feeling himself recovered from the infirmity which had occasioned the appointment of a guardian, Mr. Urquhart, on April 7, 1966, petitioned for and obtained a citation against the Bank and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryman's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Bryden's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Denner v. BeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Earnshaw AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Nagle EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. In Re Estate of WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. McCartney v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. In The Matter of the Conservatorship of Doris Davenport Doris Davenport, Doris Davenport v. Ruth AdairCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. In re Rhoads, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API