Commonwealth v. Hyde
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION PER CURIAM:
Appellant, Blair R. Hyde, was convicted by a jury of driving with a blood alcohol level of .10 percent or greater. Posttrial motions were denied and appellant was sentenced *447to forty-eight hours to eighteen months imprisonment. This direct appeal followed. We affirm.
Appellant asserts three issues for our review: (1) whether the district attorney abused its discretion by not approving appellant for the Accelerated Rehabilitation Disposition program; (2) whether the evidence was insufficient; and (3) whether the prosecutor engaged in misconduct.
Appellant first claims that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. FeflieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. O'BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. AgnewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Bowen v. BlaineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Bloomfield v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Com. v. Gilmore, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.