Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hyde

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 25, 1991No. 167PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Blair R. Hyde, was convicted by a jury of driving with a blood alcohol level of .10 percent or greater. Posttrial motions were denied and appellant was sentenced *447to forty-eight hours to eighteen months imprisonment. This direct appeal followed. We affirm.

Appellant asserts three issues for our review: (1) whether the district attorney abused its discretion by not approving appellant for the Accelerated Rehabilitation Disposition program; (2) whether the evidence was insufficient; and (3) whether the prosecutor engaged in misconduct.

Appellant first claims that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. FeflieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. O'BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. AgnewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Bowen v. BlaineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Bloomfield v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Com. v. Gilmore, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API