Legal Opinion
United States v. Sergio Arturo Villa-Gonzalez,aka Manuel Ozuna-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2000No. 99-15515PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Per curiam
Sergio Arturo Villa-Gonzalez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence, filed with our permission pursuant to section 2255 and 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). The district court denied the motion because it found that it did not meet the statutory requirements for the filing of a second or successive section 2255 motion. Villa-Gonzalez appealed and we granted a certificate of appealability. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a), and we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 10, 1990, after a two-day jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Woods v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kevin Cooper v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. David GeozosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.