Legal Opinion
F. C. Austin Manufacturing Co. v. Smithfield Township
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1899No. 2,611PublishedCited by 3 opinions
From the DeKalb Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
The complaint in this cause alleges that the appellant is the holder of a promissory note and township order issued on the 15th day of May, 1894, by one James O. Blake, the then trustee of appellant township, to one Alfred Kelly, and indorsed by said Kelly to one B. L. Blair, and by said Blair to appellant; that the note and township order is in the sum of $150 and is one of a series, and was given in *610part payment for two Austin Road Graders, the full purchase price of which was $425; that said graders were necessary, suitable, and useful for the benefit of the public highways of appellee…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wrought Iron Bridge Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Boyd v. Mill Creek School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Johnson School Township v. Citizens BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Terre Haute Brewing Co. v. HartmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Arlington Telephone Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Oppenheimer v. Jackson School TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- F. C. Austin Mfg. Co. v. Twin Brooks Tp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1902