Legal Opinion

Ditchey v. Lee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1906No. 20,786PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Claybaugh, Judge. Action by Jacob Ditchey against Charles W. Lee. From a judgment for defendant on his cross-complaint, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellant brought this action for money paid upon a contract for the purchase of certain real estate. The complaint comprises five paragraphs. The answer consists of a general denial and an affirmative paragraph, to which a reply in three paragraphs was filed. Appellee also filed a cross-complaint founded upon a promissory note, which was answered in four paragraphs, to which answers appellee replied in denial.

The errors assigned and relied upon are that the cross-complaint does not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that the court erred in each conclusion of law stated…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Davis v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. McDill v. GunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Schmueckle v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Carr v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Straus v. YeagerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Buchan v. German American Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Capitol Land Co., Inc. v. ZORNIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Buttram v. FinleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API