Legal Opinion

Isley v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1961No. 601PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WinboRne, C. J.:

The pivotal question on this appeal is whether or not the court below erred in refusing to grant defendant’s motion of nonsuit. It is conceded that the deed from the plaintiffs to the defendant is an absolute deed on its face. Furthermore, it is well settled in North Carolina that in order to correct a deed, absolute on its face, into a mortgage or security for a debt, it must be alleged and proven that the clause of redemption was omitted by reason of ignorance, mistake, fraud or undue advantage. This must be established by proof of declarations and proof of facts and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Dellinger v. . GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Furst & Thomas v. MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Breeden v. Richmond Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Hice v. Hi-Mil, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Mills v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Willetts v. WillettsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API